Sunday, 29 March 2015
For the most
part we are unaware of what a brilliant balancing act it was and still is for
our species to achieve the upright stance.
In non-existent
“ideal” conditions the normal situation would be to be light, free, and unaware
that we are, in fact, living, moving, breathing, 24/7 balancing acts whose
stability is constantly being threatened, lost and efficiently, eutonically
recovered. In ideal conditions all response option would be open to us always,
so we’d be free to choose according to circumstances.
But life
falls short of ideal. Although we all come with the same basic fabric design, we
are born neither perfectly symmetrical, nor perfectly balanced, nor perfectly
ambidextrous.
As we choose, like and prefer some options over others, using
what works and gets results fast, we pull and twist the threads of our basic
design slightly askew to accommodate our tastes. This makes choosing the same
option easier the next time around, till we don’t have to “consciously choose”
anymore: we can reset to relative “neutral” while the fabric is still young and
elastic, but our favourite choice has becomes “preset”.
The more we
choose the same paths over and over, the more they become a part of who we
believe we are, who we “feel” we are.
Eventually the choice becomes “us”, it gets recorded in the very grain of our
fabric. All the habitual twists, the stretches and pulls, the contractions and
rigidities become fixed. As our fabric ages and elasticity is lost, it becomes
harder and harder to reset to “neutral” and to choose and hold a different set
of twists and stretches on the fabric.
As we become
convinced that the twisted and stretched fabric is in effect our “neutral” and
“natural” basic design, all “other” possible options fade from our awareness.
As they fade from our awareness they become temporarily “lost” in that
ineffable place that has become for us the “unknown”. There they will lie
dormant until we choose to set out on the quest to re-awaken our potential, to
map-out the unknown.
The
“unknowable” will remain forever hidden from our human senses. But the
“unknown” will be forever there, waiting for us to map it and thus reclaim our
supreme inheritance.
Thursday, 19 March 2015
Beginnings
are tough for me. I’m all about order, but beginnings tend to be for me all
about chaos.
Most of the
chaos stems from the fact that I haven’t fully closed the previous actions. I’m
dragging the dregs of yesterday into today and tomorrow, and getting them all
jumbled up with the new stuff that wants to emerge.
What to do
about it?
If I
followed my own advice, I would quit doing stuff about it. I would find a bit
of space on the floor to lie down on my back, with my head supported on a few
books and my knees up. If I did this every day, morning and evening, I’d be making
space for change to happen.
It’s hard to
believe that just lying down like that and doing nothing will make space for
things to sort themselves out. But it does. It’s a cascade of space creation: I
make space in my day to stop doing; that leads to making space to lie down;
lying down makes space in my body to release accumulated tension; as body
tension releases, mind tension lets go too and voilá! I have created space
in my mind.
It’s all about
space: time-space, environmental-space, body-space, mind-space.
There’s
absolutely nothing else required but to take the time to rest in that space. Time
itself will take care of the rest.
When I ask myself
to start a new action, I have to allow time before saying or doing anything
more. Why? Because as soon as I ask myself to do something, I start up my
habitual response to any order (in my case too many frantic thoughts and
thoughtless actions) and it takes a little time for me to realize this and to
stop.
And it’s
only when I have remembered and stopped, created space and given myself time, it’s
only when the dust of the previous actions has settled and the waves have
quieted in the mind-pool, that the next phase can operate.
What’s the
next phase? Listening, with my whole being, for a clear and true direction.
Tuesday, 13 January 2015
It’s difficult to change what we don’t know exists. To change we need to know “what” to change,
and for that we need to have an experience that contrasts with our habit: the experience of another possibility.
But
once we have that new experience, how to we make it into a new habit? In
general, the sole experience of a new possibility
does not establish the change. It is necessary to record in your brain
the new option as a stronger neurological connection than your old habit.
For
that we need three tools: desire, inhibition, and
memory.
The tool of desire moves
us to recreate the new experience,
even when it would be “easier and more comfortable” to indulge in our habit.
Change is destabilizing. Therefore we need to become familiar with this power
of “I want”: What do I want? Why do I want it? How do I achieve what I want?
What consequences would come with getting what I want?
The tool of inhibition
allows us to choose which actions to allow manifestation and which to deny said
permission. Inhibition is intrinsically linked to
desire, for it implies “saying no to” that which we don’t wish for anymore, and
being able to “say yes to” to the new wish. You need to know “what things” to
inhibit. Therefore we need to know: What elements make up my habit?
The tool of memory
allows us to remember what we want and what we don’t want when it really
matters. The ability to recruit your desire
and your power of inhibition to change your habits rests on your ability to
remember. F.M. Alexander once said that our greatest problem when it comes to
changing habits is that “we forget to remember.”
Remembering what we want
depends, above all, on 2 factors: the strength of our wish and external
conditions that help us to remember our wish.
How can I be more mindful of my wish throughout the day? How can I make it
easier for me to satisfy my wish instead of my habit?
To sum up, the first step to being
successful in changing habits is to become familiar with your three basic
tools: Desire, Inhibition and Memory.
Wednesday, 7 January 2015
To “think ourselves into movement” we first need
to clarify our thinking.
This means first stopping to give ourselves the chance to “say no”
(inhibit) to our habitual way of moving and reacting. This habitual way
is made up of our ongoing and ingrained tension patterns which make for an
inefficient “starting place” or “set point”.
So, after
recognizing the stimulus to action, you give yourself a little pause, some
space to stop your habitual reaction and really consider “how” you want to
respond.
What
you want is a better starting place; so you get your “primary movement” going. This “primary movement”, which concerns itself with
the dynamic relationship between head & spine, leaves you in the best possible conditions for any action: a dynamic
sense of poise and balance.
Still, you haven’t
yet gone anywhere. And it’s the getting going, and the continuing to go, in the
manner you decided that is the issue at stake here.
You’ve
got to get the primary movement going first. But then you need to keep it going
as you go into movement,
when your brain recognizes what you’re up to and wants to insert the old habit
of tension.
So how do
you keep the primary movement going during all subsequent movements? You need to use your mind: mindfulness of movement
and awareness of the body as a whole throughout all movements.
In Alexander jargon this is called: “keeping your primary directions going”. F.M. Alexander himself once said, “You think that the Alexander Technique is a physical thing; I
tell you it’s the most mental thing that’s ever been discovered.”
It’s
a persistent, continuous state of monitoring progress, of mindfulness of
movement and awareness of yourself and your relationship to inner and outer
space. You want to catch
yourself when the habit pricks up its ears, so you can let it go before it
completely takes over your system. Your persistent, continuous monitoring gives
the drive, the force, the energy to the new way.
This is how
you build a new “habit”.
Thursday, 18 December 2014
On 14:59 by Unknown in Alexander Technique, Creating Space, Lessons, Principles, Process, Thinking No comments
The
Alexander Technique deals first with clearing your thinking so that you are able to move in the direction that you
wish to move, and not where your unconscious habit would take you.
So, before
setting out, you pause to remind yourself to let go of your habitual tension
patterns. And then, after the pause, it is a matter of committing to your new direction.
Ultimately,
direction is a movement from point A to point B. But, in the Alexander
Technique, we’re much more concerned with how we
travel that distance.
In
bodily terms this “how” is determined
by a “primary movement” that comes before any actual step we take in the
direction of point B.
This “primary movement”, which has its definite physical manifestation in the dynamic
relationship between head-spine-ribs-girdles-limbs, is governed by two “mind” aspects.
The first
“mind” aspect is body
awareness (body
map). During lessons we strive to raise our sensory appreciation of our body
parts, and their relationships to each other and to the whole.
The second,
and most important “mind” aspect, is perhaps unique to the Alexander Technique.
Having
determined "how" we want to travel from A to B, the Alexander Technique concerns itself
with making sure we start and keep moving in said direction in the manner that
we decided. What we don’t want is our habitual tension patterns to
sneak in on us the moment we spring into action and undo our “primary
movement”.
There are
infinite ways of getting from A to B. The “primary movement” ensures that we do
so in such a way that we’re not interfering with our natural postural reflexes.
Alexander called it “lengthening (and widening) in stature” which is akin to
“decompressing your joints for movement” or “creating space for movement to
occur.”
Thursday, 11 December 2014
On 09:45 by Unknown in Alexander Technique, Decisions, Direction, Habits, Inhibition, Principles, Stopping, Thinking No comments
Two of the top benefits of the Alexander Technique are health and posture. These are, however, not exclusive to the Technique.
The objective of the Alexander Technique could be described as “lightness and freedom of movement with minimum effort.” But here once again the Alexander Technique does not hold a
monopoly.
What
distinguishes the Alexander Technique from other mind-body disciplines isn’t so
much what comes at the end of the process, but rather the emphasis it puts on how we get there. And the key is in the
THINKING PROCESS involved.
During Alexander
Technique lessons you get to learn some of the anatomical and physiological aspects
of movement, but this is not where the true core of the work lies. When we think about the structures that we’ll be moving,
we’re not as interested in the actual movement as we are in the clarity of the thought and intention
behind the movement.
The learning
process in the Alexander Technique centers on clarifying the thinking process that gets
you into movement. Alexander called it “quickening the conscious
mind.” It’s about working with the reasoning, discriminating, creative and
decision making capabilities of our minds.
If our
bodies are not responding to our conscious wishes
perhaps it isn’t because they are structurally unable to do so, but rather
because we’re having unconscious wishes that
conflict with our conscious ones. These “unconscious wishes” are made
manifest in our muscle tension patterns.
We fail to
realize this because the unconscious wishes have been there for so long they have
become part of our “self-definition.” To go in a
new conscious direction, we must first become aware of what direction we’re
already unconsciously heading in… and let go of the conflicting wish.
This is
really what the Alexander Technique is about: If you wish to go left, you’ve
got to first pause and remind yourself to stop your habit of always going
right. Because if you rush left without thinking, that is, without “inhibiting”
your tendency to go right, you’ll end up going nowhere fully or satisfactorily.
Thursday, 4 December 2014
Most sports and
art forms have an “ideal posture” to practice them. Books and articles on them
will describe this ideal posture, and sometimes offer muscular exercises that
will help you achieve it.
However, if visually
identifying what we need to change and doing muscles exercises to correct deviations
from perfect form were enough, we’d all have good posture and no one would have
back pain from bad postural habits.
This visual and
muscular take on posture presents 3 problems.
Firstly, it assumes that he
who receives the instructions knows his own body (has a clear body
map) and can adopt the recommended posture without undue tension.
Secondly, it assumes that he
who gives instruction and he who receives it, both interpret the concepts in
the same way. Truth is we all have our own conceptual and sensorial
definitions of our different body parts (“the neck” might not be exactly the
same in my body map as in yours).
Thirdly, it assumes
that we have to “work our postural muscles” with specific exercises, otherwise
we’re bound to “go downhill” with gravity and age.*
This view does not recognize that it is our heritage as homo sapiens
sapiens to be proudly erect without undue effort if we do not
interfere with the postural reflexes of our elegant design.
If instead we adopt
the view that nature made us upright bipeds, and did so quite satisfactorily, then we shouldn’t
so much “learn” to stand upright as “un-learn” to stand crookedly.
As homo sapiens
sapiens we’re inheritors of a basic “software” that enables us to stand on our
two feet in easy balance. This “software” is made up of a set of reflexes that
we integrate, with greater or lesser success, during our early development. Since
we all have the software, perhaps all we need is a little re-programming.
Hence, the best way to work on your posture is first
to recognize what you must “stop doing.”
We must go to the
deeper causes, to what is under the surface and cannot be seen with the naked eye.
Self-knowledge
is at the base of good posture.
* I don’t mean by
this that you should not do exercise to correct muscle weaknesses that go hand
in hand with bad posture and lack of joint mobility. What I do encourage you to
do is to work those muscles ‘functionally’ and considering your body as a whole
unit. You should be conscious of the balance and integration of your whole body
during movement, and not just work the “weak muscles” in isolation.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




.jpg)





